Skip to main content

How is smoke harmful to the human body?

It really depends on the kind of smoke more than anything.


Cigarette smoke is a hazard due to things mixed into the tobacco, like tar and other chemicals. Because it is often inhaled directly, and pushed into the lungs, it can affect the cells even in the deepest portions of the lungs. Chemicals in cigarettes can be mutagens, and cause mutations in the cells of the lung, possibly causing cancer.


Smoke from house fires can be dangerous, as it occupies space in the lung, preventing oxygen from reaching the bloodstream. In addition, smoke can be heated to the point of damaging and burning cells, causing them to die.


Some smoke contains carbon monoxide, which can bond to red blood cells, and displace the oxygen that needs to reach the cells.


Some smokes, like CS gas, can contain chemicals that damage the lung itself. Mustard gas, as an example, can cause blisters to form in the lung. When these pop, the patient may drown. Gas weapons are extremely dangerous.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.