Skip to main content

What does Heck Tate say about Tom Robinson in Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird?

In Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird, one time in which Sheriff Heck Tate speaks directly of Tom Robinson, he expresses his guilt for having made Robinson's arrest, which precipitated Robinson's unjust death.

During Robinson's trial, Atticus had convinced Sheriff Tate of Robinson's innocence by making Sheriff Tate realize it would have been impossible for Robinson to bruise Mayella Ewell in her right eye when he is crippled in both his left arm and hand.


By Chapter 30, Sheriff Tate expresses his guilt over having arrested Robinson. In this chapter, Scout and Jem have just been rescued from Bob Ewell, and Atticus has stated his belief that Jem was responsible for Ewell's death, believing the matter should be brought to court. Sheriff Taylor, knowing that Arthur Radley actually killed Ewell in defense of the children, tries to convince Atticus to let the matter drop because Sheriff Tate sees how immoral it would be to bring Arthur out into the limelight, bringing him to trial, simply for saving the lives of Atticus's children. Thinking about this immorality makes Sheriff Tate reflect on his earlier immoral deed of wrongfully and prejudicially arresting Robinson. By way of confession, he tells Atticus that he may not be a "very good man," but, as sheriff, he knows the right thing to do, which is leave Ewell's death alone since Ewell has now received his just deserts for causing the unjust death of Robinson:



There's a black boy dead for no reason, and the man responsible for it's dead. Let the dead bury the dead this time, Mr. Finch. Let the dead bury the dead.



In speaking of a "black boy dead," Sheriff Tate is referring to Robinson, whose death Ewell is responsible for. The fact that Sheriff Tate thinks Ewell is responsible for Robinson's death, rather than thinking Robinson's own criminal actions caused his death, shows us Sheriff Tate now sees Robinson as innocent and feels guilty for having made the arrest that led to Robinson's death.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more