Skip to main content

How did the French relations with the Native Americans compare with those of Great Britain and Spain?

The French, British, and Spanish encountered the Native Americans when they established colonies in the Americas. However, only the French had a good relationship with the Native Americans.


The French treated the Native Americans well. They traded with them. They made it clear they didn’t want to take away their land. They also learned the languages of the Native American tribes. In addition, they married the Native Americans. There was respect between the French and the Native Americans.


The British and Spanish didn’t have a very good relationship with them. These countries wanted to take away the land of the Native Americans. The Spanish enslaved them and exploited their land for minerals. They also tried to convert them to Christianity. The Native Americans resented these actions. The British viewed the Native Americans as inferior. The British tried to impose their laws upon them. This also led to poor a relationship with them.


The French had a good relationship with the Native Americans because they treated them well, unlike the British or the Spanish.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.