Skip to main content

What does de Beauvoir say about sexual choice and desire in the chapter "Sexual Initiation" in Book Two of The Second Sex? What is the most...

De Beauvior's premise is that sex, for women, is always about becoming "prey" for the man. Sex is always about the objectification of women by men; men are "active" in that they seek to penetrate the woman; women are "passive" in that they are receptacles for male desire. In this way all sex is a kind of rape; women, by virtue of their anatomy, are required to undergo violation.


De Beauvoir traces how this objectification is manifest in the psychology of women, with sections dealing with the awakening of desire, loss of virginity, and frigidity. There is a kind of doubleness in feminine sexuality that comes from, on the one hand, the clitoris as the center of sexual pleasure, and, on the other, the vagina as the center of biological reproduction. Perhaps the most memorable section of the chapter, if one can be singled out, is her attempt to distinguish the nature of feminine sexual pleasure from male pleasure. Male pleasure is finite, and has a definite, and biologically significant, end: ejaculation. Female pleasure, however, can take many forms, she argues; a female orgasm is much more indefinite, and the female urge, far from reaching a final goal, as in the male, is rather to achieve a kind of infinite, suffused pleasure.


She concludes by saying that what women envy in men is not, as Freud thought, their penises, but rather their "prey," the power to objectify others. This is perhaps the most significant observation in the chapter; it suggests that while male autonomy is a result of their sexuality, for women this autonomy must be gained in spite of their sexuality.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.