Skip to main content

How has Hamlet's thick and textured plot, rich characters, and thought-provoking poetry led it to endure the course of time and be praised as one...

Shakespeare's most famous tragedy enjoys the rare distinction of sustained popularity. While the play owes its consistent relevance to several factors, I'd like to highlight a few specific ones. First of all, the play's plot and characters wrestle with universal questions and problems that remain relevant across generational divides. Hamlet proves to be a particularly enigmatic figure, as he struggles to come to terms with his mother's marriage to his uncle, his vow to avenge his father's murder, and his increasingly distressing suicidal impulses. Furthermore, readers continue to debate whether or not Hamlet is crazy, and so the protagonist's questionable sanity lends an intriguingly ambiguous and complex layer to not only the character, but to the plot of the play. It helps that Shakespeare renders all of these components in rich poetry, as the musicality of the language makes the already compelling material even more memorable. The famous "To be or not to be" speech, for instance, transforms Hamlet's flirtation with suicide into a poetic occasion, making his distress a poignant meditation on the meaning of existence. All in all, the play continues to be important because it not only grapples with important and universal issues, but also because it does so with some of the best poetry in the English language.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.