Skip to main content

In Shakespeare's play Hamlet, how do Laertes and Hamlet compare as sons? What is the nature of Claudius' questions?

Your post presents two distinct ideas regarding William Shakespeare's tragedy Hamlet. I'll address each individually: 


  1. Compare Laertes and Hamlet as sons. 
    Hamlet and Laertes have a startling amount in common, which is not immediately apparent to the reader given Hamlet's immediate presentation as somewhat insane, which contrasts sharply against Laertes' apparent success and composure. However, each son is desperately loyal to his father, which in turn motivates many of their respective actions. Where the two men differ is in their philosophical reflection; Laertes, upon the news of first his father's and then Ophelia's deaths, is intent on revenge. This is unlike Hamlet, who agonizes over the certainty of his father's killer's identity, the morality of revenge, and the mortality of man. 

  2. What is the nature of Claudius' questions? 
    I'm assuming you're referring to IV.vii, in which Claudius asks Laertes a series of questions. His questions are designed to insinuate that Laertes will not be a good son if he does not avenge his father's death. 

I would go more in depth with #2, but  I am unsure of whether or not this is specifically the scene to which you refer.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.