Skip to main content

Why does the gang allow Trevor to become leader in "The Destructors"?

T. becomes leader when he suggests destroying Old Misery’s house and the group votes to do it. 


The story takes place after World War II, where a group of misfit teenagers meet in a carpark to make trouble. Their leader is a boy named Blackie. The gang is joined by Trevor, who is called T. He should be ostracized because his parents come from money, but he has an air of mystery. They boys do not tease him. 


T.’s rise to power comes with the information he has about Old Misery. Old Misery is a grumpy old man with a big house that needs repair from the war. Old Misery is trying to do it himself. The house doesn’t even have operational plumbing. On the day the group is voting what to do, T. is late and it turns out he was looking at the house. He tells them it is beautiful, and proposes they destroy it for their next project. 


Blackie is opposed to the plan. He doesn't think it is possible for a dozen boys to do. T. disagrees, and suggests it be put to a vote. It is voted on, and T. wins. 



T. said, “It’s carried.”


“How do we start?” Summers asked.


“He’ll tell you,” Blackie said. It was the end of his leadership. He went away to the back of the car-park and began to kick a stone, dribbling it this way and that.



Since Blackie was opposed to the plan, and T. seems to know what he is doing, the group willingly follows him. There is nothing Blackie can do. He has lost his credibility with the group. T. has a plan that appeals to everyone, and Blackie opposed it. He is obsolete. The project is T.'s so Blackie has nothing to lead.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.