Skip to main content

What are some things that the 5th graders learned during their No Talking experience?

One lesson that the children learn in their "No Talking" experience is the power of solidarity.


The fifth graders begin to understand the power they possess when they stick together.  After Dave and Lynsey initially issue their challenge, the kids take sides.  While there are challenges, they begin to understand the need to act in the name of their side.  They also begin to realize the power they wield because they stand with one another in their vow of silence. They understand how much power they wield over the adults in the school.  For example, in their solidarity to remain silent, they transform the lunchroom and the playground during recess.  Part of why Mrs. Hiatt reacts the way she does is because she is unable to formulate an effective response to the strong display of unity that the children demonstrate.  This is shown when Dave recognizes that he could not remember the last time "an adult apologized to him."  In their pledge to stand with one another, the children have learned the importance of collective identity.  The fact that there is no winner at the end of the contest underscores that the students have learned the power of solidarity as a result of their experience.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.