Skip to main content

Scan the following lines from Lady Mary Chudleigh's poem "To the Ladies." Mark the syllables, separate the feet with short vertical lines, and...

In poetry, a "foot" is a measure of syllabic meter and stress that includes two syllables. Let's do as you requested and separate the feet within this excerpt from the poem with bold vertical lines:



Him STILL  |  must SERVE,  |  him STILL  |  oBEY,


And NO-  |  thing ACT  |  and NO-  |  thing SAY,


But WHAT  |  her HAUGH-  |  ty LORD  |  thinks FIT,


Who WITH  |  the POWER  |  has ALL  |  the WIT.



You will also notice that I have placed some words (or parts of words) in all caps while leaving other words without this emphasis. I did this to help you note the pattern of stresses within these four lines. Normally we would "scan" a poem with the use of markings--a small "u" over syllables that are unstressed and an accent or slash ("/") over syllables that are stressed. However, since we are typing this out rather than handwriting the scansion, this is the easiest way to convey the stresses. Unstressed syllables have been left without the capitalization and stressed syllables have been placed in all caps. For example, in the first foot, "him" is unstressed and "still" is stressed. 


With these markings in place, it's easy to see the meter of these lines. There are clearly four feet per line (which means it's written in tetrameter-- the prefix "tetra" meaning "four") and each foot contains one unstressed syllable followed by one stressed syllable (which is a pattern known as an "iamb"). Thus, these four lines are written in iambic tetrameter.


The line that most often puzzles students who are trying to scan this poem is the final one we see here: "Who with the power has all the wit." In our contemporary English, "power" would be pronounced with two syllables, which would result in that line actually containing an extra syllable-- a total of nine syllables, which would throw off the established tetrameter. However, "power" is actually pronounced as one stressed syllable within this context: "pow'r." This is a common manipulation that the poet has used to keep her meter intact. We see this technique used again later in the poem when the poet writes, "And all the fawning flatt'rers hate." Don't let it confuse you—this line is still in iambic tetrameter!


This leaves us at our final (and easiest) step: establishing the rhyme scheme. When we look at the final word in each line, it's clear that there's a detectable pattern here. "Obey" rhymes with "say," and "fit" rhymes with "wit." Thus, these lines are occurring in rhymed couplets with a pattern of AABB.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.