Skip to main content

`sum_(n=1)^oo n^k*e^(-n)` Use the Integral Test to determine the convergence or divergence of the series, where k is a positive integer.

The Integral test says that this sum will converge if and only if this integral also converges:`int_{1}^{infty} x^k e^{-x} dx `

When integrating this, we would use integration by parts, and we would need to use it k times. The first set of parts is
`u = x^k, dv = e^{-x} dx, du = k x^{k-1} dx, v = -e^{-x}`



`int u dv = u v - int v du = - x^k e^{-x}|_1^infty + int_{1}^{infty} k x^{k-1} e^{-x} dx `


Then we repeat for `u_1 = x^{k-1}` , and so on until we have only the `e^{-x}` term left.



But the important thing is that the last term would only be in terms of a constant times `int e^-x dx` , which clearly converges; and then all the other terms would look like this, for some integer `1 leq p leq k`
and some constant C:



`C x^p e^{-x} |_{1}^{infty}`

The value of this term at `x = 1 ` we can simply calculate; no problem there, it will be some finite number. The limit as x goes to infinity we can also determine by the fact that `e^x` always increases faster than any polynomial as x gets very large, and thus for any value of p, this limit must be zero.

Thus, we have k-1 terms that are finite (zero minus a finite value), plus one final term that is a convergent integral. Therefore the whole integral converges; therefore the sum converges.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.