Skip to main content

Why does Raina call herself a "prosaic little coward"?

To be "prosaic" is to be concerned with everyday, mundane, practical considerations. It is the opposite of being poetic, romantic, or focused on exalted subjects. So Raina is being self-deprecating, and chiding herself for doubting that Sergius could live up to the romantic ideals from her favorite literary works and operas. She makes reference to cowardice because she had 



"…an uneasy fear that [Sergius] might cut a poor figure there beside all those clever Russian officers."



In Raina's view -- based on her romantic stories from literature and opera -- there are clearly defined sex roles. Great men do heroic deeds. Women aren't called upon to show as much physical courage as the men do -- they don't have to risk death in battle. But they are supposed to demonstrate their mettle by showing unwavering faith in the heroism of their men folk. They don't question whether the whole thing is a misguided delusion, or fear that their men are going to fail or die. They aren't troubled by the anxious thought that their men are just regular people with regular needs and weaknesses.


But that's just what Raina had been doing. As she confesses to her mother:



Well, it came into my head...that perhaps we only had our heroic ideas because we are so fond of reading Byron and Pushkin, and because we were so delighted with the opera that season at Bucharest... [Remorsefully] Only think, mother: I doubted him: I wondered whether all his heroic qualities and his soldiership might not prove mere imagination when he went into a real battle.



Her mother agrees: Raina shouldn't have doubted him. But Raina feels happy relief to think that her doubts have been proven wrong, and is able to laugh about her former status as a "prosaic little coward."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.