Skip to main content

What is the role of disease in Tracks, and how does this relate to Peter Barry's postcolonial theme of "double or hybrid identity"? How are these...

In the novel, disease highlights the fracturing of the Ojibwe identity. Peter Barry describes this process of fragmentation in terms of hybridization or duality.


The role of disease is two-fold: Erdrich draws attention to the fragmenting nature of disease on both a macro and micro level. At the macro level, disease threatens the viability of the entire Ojibwe societal structure. At the micro level, disease is a metaphor for the conflicting duality that epitomizes the post-colonial Ojibwe experience.


Peter Barry asserts that the post-colonial experience encapsulates the journey to overcome this hybridity. The first stage describes the "Adopt" stage, where the native mind absorbs European norms as universally relevant. The second stage describes the "Adapt" stage, where the native mind adapts European values to native suppositions. The last stage is the "Adept" stage, where the native mind has achieved full independence from colonial philosophical constructs.


Through Nanapush's story, Erdrich highlights the infectious diseases European civilization brought to native American shores. Although diseases such as small pox, cholera, mumps, and tuberculosis were not necessarily fatal to Europeans, these diseases caused widespread deaths among tribes like the Ojibwe (Chippewa). However, in his characteristic Native American humor, Nanapush describes himself as the "trickster" who managed to cheat death through his loquaciousness. His character is juxtaposed against that of Pauline, who struggles to reconcile her Ojibwe identity with her post-colonial inclinations.


At the micro level, Pauline is "sick." Of mixed blood, Pauline tries to replace her tribal ethics for European conceptions of purity. She frets that all Natives are invisible to Europeans and begins to believe that European civilization is superior, both philosophically and politically. As an act of rebellion, she converts to Christianity and joins the Sacred Heart Convent. When the convent tells her that only white girls can be admitted as nuns, Pauline rejects her Anishinaabe heritage and proclaims that she will only recognize her European identity. Pauline's hybrid identity is represented as emotionally and mentally destructive in the novel. In reference to Peter Barry's theory, Pauline is stuck in the "Adopt" stage.


She sees her own people as diseased or sick and in need of European succor:



I saw the people I had wrapped, the influenza and consumption dead whose hands I had folded. They traveled, lame and bent, with chests darkened from the blood they coughed out of their lungs, filing forward and gathering, taking a different road. A new road. I saw them dragging one another in slings and litters. I saw their unborn children hanging limp or strapped to their backs, or pushed along in front hoping to get the best place when the great shining doors, beaten of air and gold, swung open on soundless oiled fretwork to admit them all.



In the end, unable to reconcile her conflicting duality, Pauline is driven to madness. She is powerless against her dueling inclinations; despite her fervor for Christian purity, she is drawn to evil. She is a "windigo," an Ojibwe term for one who has been drawn into satanic madness. Pauline uses her supernatural powers to kill Mary Pepewas, thinking that she is doing the sick girl a favor. So, in the novel, disease highlights the dueling identity within the Ojibwe psyche and demonstrates its destructive power.


Sources:


Beginning Theory: An Introduction to Literary and Cultural Theory by Peter Barry.


Tracks on a Page: Louise Erdrich, Her Life and Works by Frances Washburn

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.