Skip to main content

What is the role of disease in Tracks, and how does this relate to Peter Barry's postcolonial theme of "double or hybrid identity"? How are these...

In the novel, disease highlights the fracturing of the Ojibwe identity. Peter Barry describes this process of fragmentation in terms of hybridization or duality.


The role of disease is two-fold: Erdrich draws attention to the fragmenting nature of disease on both a macro and micro level. At the macro level, disease threatens the viability of the entire Ojibwe societal structure. At the micro level, disease is a metaphor for the conflicting duality that epitomizes the post-colonial Ojibwe experience.


Peter Barry asserts that the post-colonial experience encapsulates the journey to overcome this hybridity. The first stage describes the "Adopt" stage, where the native mind absorbs European norms as universally relevant. The second stage describes the "Adapt" stage, where the native mind adapts European values to native suppositions. The last stage is the "Adept" stage, where the native mind has achieved full independence from colonial philosophical constructs.


Through Nanapush's story, Erdrich highlights the infectious diseases European civilization brought to native American shores. Although diseases such as small pox, cholera, mumps, and tuberculosis were not necessarily fatal to Europeans, these diseases caused widespread deaths among tribes like the Ojibwe (Chippewa). However, in his characteristic Native American humor, Nanapush describes himself as the "trickster" who managed to cheat death through his loquaciousness. His character is juxtaposed against that of Pauline, who struggles to reconcile her Ojibwe identity with her post-colonial inclinations.


At the micro level, Pauline is "sick." Of mixed blood, Pauline tries to replace her tribal ethics for European conceptions of purity. She frets that all Natives are invisible to Europeans and begins to believe that European civilization is superior, both philosophically and politically. As an act of rebellion, she converts to Christianity and joins the Sacred Heart Convent. When the convent tells her that only white girls can be admitted as nuns, Pauline rejects her Anishinaabe heritage and proclaims that she will only recognize her European identity. Pauline's hybrid identity is represented as emotionally and mentally destructive in the novel. In reference to Peter Barry's theory, Pauline is stuck in the "Adopt" stage.


She sees her own people as diseased or sick and in need of European succor:



I saw the people I had wrapped, the influenza and consumption dead whose hands I had folded. They traveled, lame and bent, with chests darkened from the blood they coughed out of their lungs, filing forward and gathering, taking a different road. A new road. I saw them dragging one another in slings and litters. I saw their unborn children hanging limp or strapped to their backs, or pushed along in front hoping to get the best place when the great shining doors, beaten of air and gold, swung open on soundless oiled fretwork to admit them all.



In the end, unable to reconcile her conflicting duality, Pauline is driven to madness. She is powerless against her dueling inclinations; despite her fervor for Christian purity, she is drawn to evil. She is a "windigo," an Ojibwe term for one who has been drawn into satanic madness. Pauline uses her supernatural powers to kill Mary Pepewas, thinking that she is doing the sick girl a favor. So, in the novel, disease highlights the dueling identity within the Ojibwe psyche and demonstrates its destructive power.


Sources:


Beginning Theory: An Introduction to Literary and Cultural Theory by Peter Barry.


Tracks on a Page: Louise Erdrich, Her Life and Works by Frances Washburn

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...