Skip to main content

What is a socially-just solution to the problem in Omelas?

A socially-just solution to the problem in "The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas" would address the suffering of the child.


A socially-just solution represents a desire for equity.  It strives to provide fairness for all people in a social setting. This would mean that the inherent unfairness in Omelas would have to be addressed. For example, freeing the child from being imprisoned would be one socially-just solution.


Le Guin's story is predicated upon the idea that the people in Omelas can only be happy because the child suffers.  A solution predicated upon social justice might involve freeing the child, would remedy this predicament.   It would be rooted in fairness for all people and would seek to reverse institutional unfairness.  The child would experience the same freedom that the people of Omelas experience. This mindset is socially-just because it challenges how the townspeople see the child. The townspeople know that they can only be happy because the child is miserable.  A socially-just solution would require be one that is fair to all people.    


In seeking to eliminate the child's suffering, a socially-just solution would be concerned with equity for all.  Regardless of the the happiness of other people, it would emphatically suggest that the child's condition has to be remedied. When this is done, the society of Omelas is closer to being more just because it moves closer to fairness.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.