Skip to main content

What were the causes for English colonial expansion into the West during the mid-1700s?

If we mean the American, or Trans-Appalachian West, then the reasons were fairly simple. American colonists desired more cheap land so that they could become independent landowners. This was the driving force behind westward expansion ever since the establishment of colonies along the North American coasts, and was a source of constant tension between British colonists and Native Americans. In the mid-eighteenth century, the main destination for settlers was the Piedmont of Virginia and the Carolinas and even as far south as Georgia. Settlers, mostly Scots-Irish, made their way down the so-called "Great Wagon Trail" from Pennsylvania into the region, where cheap land was to be had. In a little over a decade, settlers were already moving into the Ohio River Valley and Kentucky, defying a proclamation from King George III that lands west of the Appalachians were not to be settled. So expansion into the West was more the result of the desires of ordinary colonists (and wealthy land speculators) to gain cheap land than a concerted effort on the part of the British crown to colonize the region. In fact, the Crown sought to limit these settlements.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...