Skip to main content

Do human rights exist if no one is willing to protect or enforce them?

This is a very deep question, and it reminds me of the famous thought problem, "If a tree falls in the woods, and nobody is around to hear it, does it make a sound?"


Our entire understanding of human rights (as an idea and as "things") is based on the fact that there have been times and places where human rights were not explicitly defined and people chose to abuse these otherwise naturally understood concepts. For example, we might feel that it's common sense that no person should be murdered or be forced to labor without adequate pay. When we look at the reality of our global history, both of these rights to life and livelihood have been violated a number of times. If we, as individual cultures and as a globally connected species, create a social contract regarding human rights, we can better try to prevent violations and have appropriate responses in place. 


Even though we are such a highly connected global community, we still experience divisions on the basis of language, ethnicity, location, and religion. Some people may feel that these divisions are enough to justify the violations of others who do not fall into our own identity group, but this is not true. Human rights are inalienable and hold true for all people. The fact that to this day there are those who might wish to violate the rights of others really speaks to how much we need to have human rights guidelines explicitly laid out. If every person were to agree and know in their hearts and minds what constitutes human rights and respect or violation of these rights, we might not need to have explicit guidelines. We might not even have a need for the idea of human rights if everyone had an internally understood and outwardly practiced concept of respect for the human person. 


I think that to answer your question in a philosophical sense, no, "human rights" as an idea does not exist if there is nobody around to violate or enforce respect for others. When I am alone by myself in a room, there is nobody to violate my human rights, nobody to enforce it, and so the idea of human rights does not even come into play. In a greater and more practical sense, I do believe that human rights exist regardless of the presence of an enforcer. Even if there is nobody in a room with me to violate my personhood, I still have a right to life and livelihood.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more