Skip to main content

How has the Republican Party transformed in values from Abraham Lincoln's era to current times?

In Lincoln's era, the Republican Party was newly formed by anti-slavery Democrats, Free-Soilers, and Whigs, which dissolved as a party in the 1850s. Their main concern at this time was the abolition of slavery. After that was achieved with the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, the Republicans focused on Reconstruction, but quickly ended this project with their concession to the South in the form of the Compromise of 1877, signed by Republican President Rutherford B. Hayes.


Until the 1930s, most blacks either did not vote (black men did not gain the right until the Fifteenth Amendment was ratified in 1870; black women did not gain the right of suffrage until 1920) or tended to vote Republican, due to the party's association with abolition. Of course, voter intimidation was very common in the South, which was a stronghold for the Democratic Party. This affiliation persisted, even after the sweeping reforms created by the New Deal. Republicans, however, were opposed to Roosevelt's economic plan.


By this time, the Republican Party became the favored party among those in the West, of wealthy people, and of those who lived in the growing suburbs. Most importantly, Republicans were overwhelmingly white Anglo-Saxon Protestants. Meanwhile, urban areas became more heavily Democratic. This shift coincided with the migration of blacks to Northern cities at the beginning of the twentieth century, as well as the influx of immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe and Asia. These new citizens, particularly blacks, relied on Franklin D. Roosevelt's reforms, even though, arguably, they were not most directly intended for these groups.


The realignment in the Republican Party in the 1930s -- from a party formed to address a social injustice to a party that became increasingly anti-immigrant and staunchly anti-union -- is directly related to Roosevelt's policies and to changes in demographics. The Republican Party's association with white Anglo-Saxon Protestant citizens has persisted to date with few exceptions.


This is not to say that Democrats were more enlightened. During the Civil Rights era, many Southern Democrats, known as "Dixiecrats," were firmly opposed to advancements for blacks. Meanwhile, some Republicans, like former New York governor (and, later, Vice President) Nelson Rockefeller, made great strides against discrimination towards blacks and women in areas such as housing and education. However, Rockefeller was a moderate Republican serving from the mid- to late-1960s, a considerably progressive era, due to Lyndon B. Johnson's leadership. 


Under Johnson, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was signed, followed by the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Johnson famously said that, with the stroke of his pen, the Democratic Party, to which he belonged, would lose the South forever. His premonition came true. The South, with the exception of West Virginia, became firmly Republican. The spiteful exit of the South from the Democratic Party (though, today, a couple of states have returned and others may soon return) forced a shift in values in the Republican Party. While the party retained its anti-labor platform and its distaste for higher taxes on the wealthy, it also absorbed a more socially conservative strain, drawn from Fundamentalist values that are more intrinsic to the South and parts of the Midwest.


These values became centralized in the Republican Party with the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980. The social values platform on which Republicans claimed to stand remains pertinent to them today. Platforms related to the rights of immigrants, blacks, and women, which began to be addressed in the 1930s, remain more closely associated with the Democrats -- the pro-slavery party of Lincoln's time.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

etymology - Origin of the greeting "Sweet dreams".

Does anybody know the etymology of the phrase "sweet dreams"? I tried googling but did not find anything satisfying. Is this a relatively new phrase of the modern world or has this been in use for some time? I think it's the latter one. Answer The OED has the interjection as "a farewell to someone going to bed" from the 20th century: 1908 Sears Roebuck Catal. 198/1 Tenor Solos..Good Bye, Sweet Dreams, Good Bye. But it goes back until at least the 19th and possibly 18th centuries. John Wolcot, writing under the pseudonym of Peter Pindar, used it in his poem "Orson and Ellen; A Legendary Tale" published in 1801: Also from 1801 in The infernal Quixote (Page 287) by Charles Lucas: In the March 1776 of The Universal Magazine was published "The Serenade. A Pastoral Tale. From the German of Gesner" , where the shepherd Daphnis watches over his beloved as she sleeps and sings: The same tale appears in 1776's as Idyl XI, " Daphnis ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are the similarities between the relationships of the characters in The Outsiders and Romeo and Juliet?

At first glance, it might appear as if the characters in  The Outsiders  by S. E. Hinton and  Romeo and Juliet  by William Shakespeare do not have much in common; however, when one isolates the core of the conflicts, it becomes clear that the relationships in both stories are rooted in rivalry and secrecy.  In both  The Outsiders  and  Romeo and Juliet , an overarching theme is rivalry. While   socioeconomic status separates the greasers from the Socs in The Outsiders , last names separates the Montagues from the Capulets, who appear to be relatively equal in terms of socioeconomic status. Due to these rivalries, there are instances of deadly interactions in both stories. In  The Outsiders , Johnny kills Bob (whether his actions were justified or not is debatable). In  Romeo and Juliet , Romeo kills Tybalt and Paris, and Tybalt kills Mercutio. These deaths have profound effects on the main characters. In Ponyboy's case, the Johnny's death and other events in the novel inspire h...
Post a Comment
Read more