Skip to main content

What was the effect of the Ottoman Empire on surrounding regions?

The expansion of the Ottoman state from a tiny principality in Anatolia into one of the largest empires of its time had a profound effect on early modern Europe, much of which endures to this day.


Sultan Mehmet II conquered Constantinople in 1453, marking the final end of the eastern Roman (or "Byzantine") Empire. Angered by the memory of the Crusades, and by the ongoing Reconquista of Muslim Andalusia by Spanish and Portuguese Christians, the Ottomans declared an embargo on European trade with Asia. European traders sought alternate routes to the Far East, beginning the Age of Exploration which led to the discovery of the Americas and of the Pacific Ocean.


By that time, however, Ottoman rule in southeast Europe was already well established. The very word "Balkans" to describe the region between the Adriatic and Black seas originated with the Turks, who named it after Balkh (Bactria) -- a Persian province in what is now northern Afghanistan. Their expansion led to repeated wars with the Austrian Habsburgs; in 1529 and again in 1683, they laid siege to Vienna itself. The second time, they were turned back only by a massive alliance (instigated by Pope Innocent XI) of the Papal States, the Holy Roman Empire under the Habsburgs, and the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth under Jan III Sobieski.


The Ottoman navy ended Venice's maritime dominance of the eastern Mediterranean, and rolled back Spanish expansion into North Africa after the Reconquista. In so doing, they preserved a safe zone for Andalusian Muslims and Jews (known as Sephardim) who had been expelled from Spain and Portugal.


The Ottomans also conquered Christian kingdoms in western Asia, including Armenia and Georgia, and sent Sufi missionaries into the Caucasus. This was the beginning of a centuries-long rivalry with Russia for dominance in the region. In the late 17th century, Russia joined the post-Vienna European alliance against the Ottomans, in what became known as the Great Turkish War.


The dramatic successes of the Ottoman military inspired European states to copy their organization, equipment, and tactics. European rulers recognized the high efficiency and morale of the Ottoman Janissary corps, and began recruiting and training their own professional armies instead of raising ad-hoc levies of conscripts or hiring mercenaries. The Ottoman infantry were one of the first to be issued with personal firearms as standard equipment, instead of relegating them to skirmishers or other auxiliaries. The Ottomans even organized the first modern military bands.


The Ottomans united dozens of nations, languages, and religions under a common political and economic system. Peoples, goods, and ideas flowed freely across the Empire. Greeks, Armenians, Jews, Turks, Arabs, Copts, Assyrians, Berbers, Kurds, Albanians, Croats, Serbs, Bulgarians, Romanians, and many others lived and worked alongside one another, with a degree of peace and prosperity no European power had attained since the height of the Roman Empire.


But unlike the Romans, the authors of this Pax Ottomanica were always seen by Europeans as intruders into what they had grown used to thinking of as "Christendom". As recently as the mid-20th century, central European mothers invoked "the Turk" as a bogeyman against children who showed a propensity to wander too far away from home. As refugees from the present chaos in former Ottoman provinces like Syria, Libya, and Iraq continue to pour into Europe today, the anxiety once engendered by "the Turk" is filling European hearts once more.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more