Skip to main content

In "The Secret Life of Walter Mitty," how does Mrs. Mitty’s personality trigger Mitty’s final daydream? Why is this dream appropriate, based on...

In Walter's last daydream, he defiantly faces a firing squad, confident in his ability to die courageously. He scornfully rejects the handkerchief or blindfold, preferring to face his fate with unflinching determination.


Walter's final daydream is more than likely triggered by how his wife treats him. She constantly berates him and inundates him with a barrage of criticism. Spiteful and disapproving words often pour out of her mouth the way bullets would shoot forth from a gun. To Walter, facing her daily onslaught of criticism is akin to facing a firing squad. Mrs. Mitty leaves no room for her husband to disagree with her. For example, when she finds him sitting in a chair in the hotel lobby, she proceeds to complain about having experienced difficulty in locating him.


Then, almost immediately, she interrogates him about whether he had managed to purchase the puppy biscuits. Next, she demands to know what he has in the box next to him. When Walter answers that it contains his overshoes, she angrily asks why he couldn't have put them on in the store. Walter answers that he had been busy thinking about some things. Mrs. Mitty then patronizingly comments that she's just going to have to take his temperature when they get home. In all, Mrs. Mitty is unwavering in her criticism of her husband's every action. Today, we would say that she is a relentless micromanager.


So, based on how his wife treats him, Walter's final daydream appropriately illustrates how he is constantly under fire in his own home. To Walter, his wife's overbearing personality makes him feel like he is being ambushed by a firing squad on a daily basis.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more