Skip to main content

How did Dr. Bell help Helen? Why did she dedicate her book to Dr. Bell?

Alexander Graham Bell helped Helen by directing her father to the school that might best be able to provide Helen with a teacher, and indeed they did. Helen dedicated the story of her life to Bell because of his work with the deaf and because he was the first to start her on her journey toward communicating and learning.



 To
ALEXANDER GRAHAM BELL

WHO has taught the deaf to speak
and enabled the listening ear to hear
speech from the Atlantic to the Rockies,
I Dedicate
this Story of My Life.



Helen's parents began their quest for a teacher for Helen when she was "about six" by going to Baltimore to consult the "eminent oculist" Dr. Chisholm. Although he could not help Helen's vision, he referred the family to Dr. Alexander Graham Bell in Washington, D.C. as the one most likely to lead them to who could educate young Helen. Happy to have them come to him in Washington, Bell referred the Kellers to Mr. Anagnos, who was "director of the Perkins Institute in Boston."


Helen's parents had heard that the then-deceased Dr. Howe of Boston had found a way to teach children who were blind and deaf. The Perkins Institute is where Dr. Howe did his groundbreaking work in teaching techniques. Helen's father followed Bell's recommendation immediately, and "in a few weeks there came a kind letter from Mr. Anagnos with the comforting assurance that a teacher had been found." Dr. Bell helped Helen by leading her to the source that would provide her educator—Anne Sullivan—and her education, and Anne Sullivan became a loyal friend.

According to the wording of the dedication, Bell "has taught the deaf to speak / and enabled the listening ear to hear." Bell invented the telephone so that anyone listening might hear speech from anyone else "from the Atlantic to the Rockies." The first reason refers to Bell's work with teaching deaf students "oralism," or the ability to vocalize speech sounds even though they couldn't hear speech sounds. Originally based on his father's "universal alphabet," but later modified to simpler techniques, Bell taught what his father called "Visible Speech" and which Bell later, after he'd made modifications, called oralism. This work and the invention of the telephone are the two reasons Helen states for her dedication. Underlying these reasons was the deep friendship Helen shared with Bell.



I at once felt the tenderness and sympathy. . . [that] would be the door through which I should pass from darkness into light, from isolation to friendship, companionship, knowledge, love.


Dr. Bell went everywhere [at the 1893 World’s Fair] with us and in his own delightful way described to me the objects of greatest interest. . . [H]e made me understand how it is possible to send a message on wires that mock space and outrun time, and, like Prometheus, to draw fire from the sky.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...