Skip to main content

`(0,7/4)` Write the standard form of the equation of the parabola with the given focus and vertex at (0,0)

A parabola opens toward to the location of focus with respect to the vertex.


When the vertex and focus has same y-values, it implies that the parabola opens sideways (left or right). 


When the vertex and focus has same x-values, it implies that the parabola may opens upward or downward. 


The given focus of the parabola `(0, 7/4)` is located above the vertex `(0,0)` . Both points has the same value of `x=0` .


Thus, the parabola opens upward. In this case, we follow the standard formula: `(x-h)^2=4p(y-k)` . We consider the following properties:


 vertex as `(h,k)`


 focus as `(h, k+p)`


  directrix as `y=k-p`


 Note: `p` is the distance of between focus and vertex or distance between directrix and vertex.


From the given vertex point `(0,0)` , we determine h =0 and k=0.


From the given focus `(0,7/4)` , we determine `h =0` and `k+p=7/4` .


Plug-in ` k=0` on `k+p=7/4` . we get:


`0+p=7/4`


`p=7/4`


Plug-in the values: `h=0` ,`k=0` , and `p=7/4`  on the standard formula, we get:


`(x-0)^2=4*7/4(y-0)`


`x^2=7y`  as the standard form of the equation of the parabola with vertex `(0,0)` and focus `(0,7/4)` .

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more