Jack is a tyrannical maniac who encourages violence, and uses fear and intimidation to control the boys in his tribe. Unlike Ralph, Jack does not take into consideration other boys' needs and selfishly makes his band of savages follow each of his demands. Jack dismisses the need to maintain a signal fire which is crucial in order to be rescued, and allows his tribe to run wild. Instead of holding assemblies, creating rules, and organizing essential tasks, Jack chooses to focus all of his energy on hunting pigs and playing. Ralph also displays courage and a strong will, while Jack continually complains and gives up when he doesn't get his way. Jack also takes unnecessary risks and leads his hunters on a dangerous search throughout the island at night. Many of Jack's decisions are rash and dangerous. His affinity for violence, quick temper, and inability to prioritize essential tasks make him a worse leader than Ralph.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment