Skip to main content

In Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird, what happens to Miss Maudie? How does she feel about it?

Miss Maudie's house burns down in Chapter Eight of To Kill A Mockingbird.  


It was an unusually cold winter in Maycomb County, and many people lit fires in their fireplaces when most years they didn't need to.  Miss Maudie's house fire may have been caused by "the flue in the kitchen. [She] kept a fire in there last night for [her] potted plants."  


Miss Maudie's entire house burns down.  The Maycomb fire truck won't start in the unusual cold and has to be pushed to her house.  Then, when it does arrive, the fire hose bursts.  Some of Miss Maudie's furniture is saved by the men of the town, but her house and her beloved yard are completely destroyed. 


Presumably Miss Maudie feels grief and loss, but she does not show it.  A true Southern lady, she steadfastly looks on the bright side.  



"Always wanted a smaller house, Jem Finch.  Gives me more yard.  Just think, I'll have more room for my azaleas now!  ... Grieving, child?  Why, I hated that old cow barn.  Thought of settin' fire to it a hundred times myself, except they'd lock me up."  



Miss Maudie's insistence that she "hated" the old house, and actually welcomes this turn of events, perhaps shades into pride.  But it is probably also an effort to spare other people, especially the children, the burden of seeing her grieve.  Even in her crisis, she is still selfless.  



Miss Maudie puzzled me.  With most of her possessions gone and her beloved yard a shambles, she still took a lively and cordial interest in Jem's and my affairs.  


"Only thing I worried about last night was all the danger and commotion it caused.  This whole neighborhood could have gone up." 



Though perhaps erring a bit too much on the side of keeping up a brave face, Miss Maudie is nevertheless a great example for the children of strength in adversity. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...