Skip to main content

How is Juliet's attitude in Act III, Scene 2 like that of Romeo in Act I, Scene 1 of Romeo and Juliet, and are there any significant differences?...

Romeo and Juliet, who feel mixed emotions, both recognize in their speeches that life is contradictory and confusing, and their use of oxymoron reflects this understanding.


In Act I, Scene 1, an emotional Romeo talks with his friend Benvolio after the street fight in which the houses of Capulet and Montague have engaged. When Romeo says, "Here's much to do with hate, but more with love" (1.1.170), he expresses his puzzlement with the fine line that exists between the two emotions, as well as the swiftness with which one emotion can transform into the other. Further, he also recognizes that emotions become entangled with one another and often are hard to distinguish, as he employs this oxymoron: "Misshapen chaos of well-seeming forms!" (1.1.175).


Similarly, after having excitedly anticipated her loving hours to come with her new husband, Juliet experiences exaggerated and conflicting feelings when she learns of Tybalt's death at the hands of Romeo. An emotional Juliet feels both deceived and betrayed while still in love with Romeo:



O serpent heart, hid with a flowering face!
Did ever dragon keep so fair a cave?
Beautiful tyrant! fiend angelical!— (3.2.74-76)



Like Romeo, Juliet, too, expresses her tangled emotions through the use of oxymorons as beautiful feelings and conflicting ideas become intermixed. However, although Juliet is focused only on one issue—the betrayal that she feels because her beloved Romeo has slain her cousin Tybalt—Romeo's contemplation of his lost love of Rosaline is interrupted as he notices Benvolio's wound. It is then that he speaks of the feud, until near the end of his speech as he resumes his contemplation of Rosaline. And, at this point, he bemoans the loss of her love: "This love feel I, that feel no love in this" (1.1.172). So, for Romeo, there is an even greater intermingling of emotions than there is for Juliet.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...