Skip to main content

What were the consequences of European expansion on global politics?

European colonization and expansion meant that wars could truly become global events now.  Nationalistic rivalry between Britain and France led to over 150 years of nearly non-stop war between 1650 and 1815.  Not only did the wars involve people who lived in the two nations, but it also involved native groups allied with those countries and colonial subjects.  These large-scale wars were not cheap to fight, so Britain and France had to improve their abilities to tax their subjects.  Britain lost its American colonies due to its inability to tax them fairly and the French monarchy was deposed due to its unfair tax burden on the peasantry.  


European colonization would also play a role in both world wars of the twentieth century as well.  Economic and nationalistic rivalries in Europe stemming from colonization helped to drive the tensions that created WWI.  In WWII Japan sought to end European colonization in Asia by making themselves the major regional power in Asia--this was one of the driving factors of WWII.  After WWII colonies in Asia and Africa sought their independence from their parent countries.  In many cases these newly formed countries such as North and South Vietnam would ally with one of the world's leading superpowers, the United States or the Soviet Union.  This would be part of the Cold War as America and the Soviet Union fought proxy wars in the developing world.  All of this was a continued legacy of European colonization.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more