Skip to main content

Why won't Walter Cunningham take the money from Miss Caroline?

Because of the way he has been brought up, Walter Cunningham won't take any lunch money from Miss Caroline.


As Scout explains in the book, Walter is a Cunningham, and in Maycomb, the Cunninghams are known to be a poor but proud family. A Cunningham will refuse a gift he cannot readily repay.




"...The Cunninghams never took anything they can’t pay back—no church baskets and no scrip stamps. They never took anything off of anybody, they get along on what they have. They don’t have much, but they get along on it."



So, despite not having any lunch, Walter refuses to take the lunch money offered by Miss Caroline. Scout explains to Miss Caroline that Walter will never have the money to repay her, and since she can't use any "stovewood," forcing Walter to take the money would be wrong. In regards to the "stovewood," Scout is referring to the way the Cunninghams usually pay for any services or products.


Scout recalls a time when Walter's father had some legal work done by Atticus. Accordingly, Mr. Cunningham later paid Atticus with stovewood, hickory nuts, turnip greens, and Christmas holly. Scout tries to explain to Miss Caroline that the Cunninghams have their own way of doing business, but Miss Caroline refuses to listen. In the end, Scout is spanked for her troubles, a punishment she considers unjust.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more