Skip to main content

In chemistry, give examples of structures that are polar at one end and nonpolar at the other end.

In chemistry, molecules can be polar or nonpolar. Which of these they are depends on the overall structure that their component chemical bonds (between the atoms present in the molecule) form. Polar molecules, water being a notable example, have positive and negative 'ends' so that when molecules of that substance are physically close the molecules weakly attract each other much like polar magnets would. 


Some chemicals, formed of component molecules, can have a polar end and nonpolar end. For example, soap, when agitated in water, forms chemical structures called micelles that have polar heads and nonpolar tails. The polar heads are water-loving (hydrophilic) and face outward towards the water environment, whereas the nonpolar tails are water - hating (hydrophobic) and huddle inward away from the water. Any greasy fats (lipids) that are in the water get shrouded by the micelles. This is because the fats are also hydrophobic so can escape from the water by joining the nonpolar lining of the micelles and being protected by the polar outer of those micelles. This is how greasy things are cleaned in water using soap (surfactants).


A similar chemical structure to soap micelles, with polar heads and nonpolar tails, can be found in the human body. Cell membranes have hydrophilic phosphate polar heads and hydrophobic lipid nonpolar tails. Nonpolar chemicals like oxygen and CO2 pass through the membrane easily. Larger polar chemicals can only enter and exit by the cell gates. This allows the body to control cell inputs and outputs.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more