Skip to main content

Explain what DuBois believes is the problem with the 20th-century. What does he mean by "the color-line?"

In W.E.B. DuBois's seminal work, The Souls of Black Folk, the problem of the twentieth-century is, indeed, that of the "color-line."


The phrase "the color-line" first appeared in an article called "The Color Line" written by Frederick Douglass for the North American Review in 1881. It became better-known when DuBois used the phrase to expand its relevance for the issues confronting black Americans in the twentieth-century.


The color-line is a direct reference to the segregation that existed in the United States -- both the legal, de jure, segregation in the South, and the de facto, or "in effect," racism in the North and the West. Segregation made it so that blacks and whites lived in such disparate worlds that their lives generally did not look at all the same. Though black people were very often aware the rights and privileges that were kept from them, particularly since working-class blacks were very often employed in white homes as domestic laborers, many white people were blind -- often willfully -- to the inferior conditions in which black people existed.


The color-line created inequalities in education, housing, and access to employment. It made it nearly impossible for black and white people to have any amity between them. Existentially, it worked to convince black people of their presumed inferiority. 


However, DuBois was concerned not only with the conditions in which black people existed in the United States, but also the lives of darker peoples in other countries, particularly the colonies in Africa, Asia, and Oceania. The subjugation of these peoples was justified by pseudo-scientific racial theories which attempted to give "the color-line" a scientific basis. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...