Skip to main content

Who was the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court that disagreed with Thomas Jefferson about many political issues?

The Chief Justice referred to in this question was John Marshall. Marshall was a Federalist, who believed in strengthening the powers of the federal government relative to the states. Jefferson, a Republican, believed in the opposite. Many of Marshall's decisions played a major role in consolidating the powers of the federal government. McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) ruled that Congress had the power, due to the Necessary and Proper Clause, to establish a national bank and that the Supremacy Clause prevented the states from taxing it. This decision was anathema to both the strict constructionist and states' rights views held by many of Jefferson's political allies (and to some extent by Jefferson himself.) In many other decisions, like Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodard, Martin v. Hunter's Lessee, and Cohens v. Virginia, the Marshall Court continued to rule in ways that strengthened the national government. Ironically, the most famous decision associated with the Marshall Court, Marbury v. Madison (1803,) which established the principle of judicial review of Congressional laws, was a decision in favor of Jefferson, whose Secretary of State, James Madison, was the defendant in the case. Also, Marshall, who nurtured an intense personal dislike for Jefferson, was actually his cousin. Both men were part of the Virginia planter elite that dominated American politics for much of the early republic period.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.