Skip to main content

What happens during the three days of the chase in "The Most Dangerous Game"?

During the three days of the dangerous game created by General Zaroff, who is the hunter and Sanger Rainsford the prey, Rainsford learns what it is to be "a beast at bay."



"You'll find this game worth playing," the general said enthusiastically." Your brain against mine. ....Your strength and stamina against mine. Outdoor chess! And the stake is not without value, eh?"



At first Rainsford races in fear; then, he gets control of himself. Working under the metaphor of a chess game, Sanger Rainsford summons his expertise as a tracker as he weaves his way through the forest, covering his tracks and creating diversions meant to slow down Zaroff. When night falls, he climbs into a large joint of a thick, huge tree. Rainsford stretches out upon one of the broad limbs, trying to rest his weary body and strained mind. Reasoning that only the devil could follow his tracks, Rainsford suddenly worries that Zaroff may, indeed, be a devil.
Toward dawn, Rainsford hears someone moving through the bush, so he flattens himself as much as possible against the branch. It is Zaroff, who has trailed him to the tree. He stops and his eyes work their way up the tree. Zaroff, then lights a cigarette. 



Very deliberately he blew a smoke ring into the air; then he turned his back on the tree and walked carelessly away, back along the trail he had come. 



Rainsford realizes that General Zaroff is saving him for another day.


Resolved not to lose his nerve, Rainsford hurries through the undergrowth until he is about three hundred yards from the tree and forms a trap to catch Zaroff. But, with the sureness of a bloodhound, Zaroff follows close behind. When he reaches the trap, the general stops, but he is not quite quick enough. 



...the dead tree, delicately adjusted to rest on the cut living one, crashed down and struck the general a glancing blow on the shoulder as it fell; but for his alertness, he must have been smashed beneath it.



General Zaroff compliments Rainsford, "Not many men know how to make a Malay mancatcher." Then, he says that his shoulder has been injured, and he is returning to his chateau to have his wounds dressed.


Rainsford pushes on and finds himself temporarily stuck in a mire. Then, he realizes that he can build a Burmese tiger trap there. After completing this deadly trap that is set to impale its victim, he waits. After a while he hears swift movement through the underbrush and one of the general's dogs falls into this trap. Again the general congratulates Rainsford for "an amusing evening."  He promises to return with the pack of dogs.


At daybreak Rainsford hears the baying of hounds; he knows there is nothing to do but try to flee them.



Across a cove he could see the gloomy gray stone of the chateau. Twenty feet below him the sea rumbled and hissed. Rainsford hesitated. He heard the hounds. Then he leaped far out into the sea. . . . 



That night the general enjoys a delicious meal. Before he retires to his bedroom, he consoles his hounds, "Better luck next time." When he enters his bed chamber, Rainsford emerges from behind the curtains. Shocked, the general asks him how he has entered the chateau and his room. "Swam," Rainsford responds. General Zaroff congratulates Rainsford, "You have won the game."



Rainsford did not smile. "I am still a beast at bay," he said, in a low, hoarse voice. "Get ready, General Zaroff."



Rainsford defeats his enemy and sleeps in his bed that night.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more