Skip to main content

How can cultural differences and dissimilar value systems lead to communication problems or misunderstandings?

Cultural identity, and the related value system, of any group is based on fundamental principles, which guide worldviews. Worldviews, or ways of interpreting the surrounding world, play a huge role in communication. Fundamental assumptions drive interpersonal interactions, so when these assumptions are different, communication can go haywire.


For example, consider the differences between individualistic cultures (of western countries like the US) and collectivistic cultures (of eastern countries like Japan). In individualistic cultures, people make decisions based on their own self worth and personal goals. The idea in cultures that are self-focused is that, while society is important, it is more important to succeed as an individual. On the other hand, collectivistic cultures tend to value the success of a group over individual success.


What's important to understand is that the responses are very different in their basic assumptions. While a person from an individualistic culture may value and praise a young person charting her own path, a person from a collectivistic culture may be disappointed or offended by this person's decisions.


In conversation, differences like these can become apparent when two or more people feel very differently about an issue. Often, culture is driven by morality, which is very often tied to religion. Consider the difference in value systems between religions.


Whereas Buddhism values peaceful resolution of conflict, Christianity has sometimes been driven by a violent "eye-for-an-eye" mentality. If you ask a person whose culture has been influence by Buddhism how to solve an international dispute, the answer might be very different than that of a person whose culture is influenced by Christianity. In fact, people from different cultures may be appalled by the suggestions of the opposite group. To a Buddhist, a Christian's desire to enter a war to "protect" their country may seem like a poor decision filled with hate. On the other hand, a Christian may see a Buddhist's desire to peacefully resolve a war as a weak response to conflict.


Because cultural identity is so dependent on morality, the fundamental assumptions of people with different backgrounds are likely to disrupt communication on even the most basic of issues.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.