Skip to main content

What were the federal government’s goals for Reconstruction, and what steps did they take to achieve those goals?

The main goal of Reconstruction was to reunify the North and South.  Each state in the former Confederacy had to develop a new constitution that prohibited slavery.  The federal government had somewhat ambiguous goals for extending rights to the former slaves, granting them their freedom in 1865, citizenship in 1868, and suffrage for black males over the age of 21 in 1870.  When state governments in the South tried to get in the way of the black suffrage movement, the North started military Reconstruction under Grant, and this would continue until 1877.  There was also the goal of creating stable state governments in the South that were pro-Union, and this meant granting many former Confederate leaders such as Alexander Stevens their American citizenship.  This was controversial, as many considered the first Reconstruction president, Andrew Johnson, to be soft on the ex-Confederates.  The final and most important goal of Reconstruction was that it should end--the American people did not intend for the federal army to occupy the South forever.  Reconstruction ended with the Compromise of 1877 when the Republican Rutherford B. Hayes won the White House on the condition that the occupation army left the South, thus leaving the former slaves on their own.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.