Skip to main content

In "Contents of the Dead Man's Pocket," if Finney chose to focus only on the external conflict, and had not included internal conflict, how would...

Your question is asking for a bit of speculation on the reader’s part. If the internal conflict is removed from Jack Finney’s short story “Contents of the Dead Man’s Pocket” it becomes a man versus elements story. Finney’s purpose with his original story is to demonstrate how Tom’s need for recognition and wealth interfere with his understanding of the importance of his relationship with his wife, and an appreciation for what they already have.


If Tom were not dealing with his inner conflict, he may not have gone out on the ledge to retrieve the piece of paper containing his notes for a work project. The project would not hold the same importance for him, so losing it out the window would not be quite as significant.


If Tom did go out on the ledge after the paper, the portions of the story that emphasized Tom’s inner feelings would be eliminated, while his physical tribulations would have been highlighted to a greater extent.  The author would have a different focus or theme for the story, which would not include Tom’s epiphany about the direction of his life. His inner conflict of wanting to rise in the corporate ranks while his wife waited in the wings for her husband’s attention would be eliminated.


Instead the author may have focused on Tom’s ability to overcome his fears while balancing on the ledge, and his triumph of retrieving the piece of paper, which contained months of research. Therefore, the focus would be on Tom’s ability to defeat the elements and to be successful in retrieving the piece of paper.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.