It would seem that the United States caused the Cold War from the eight documents associated with this project. The first document suggests a certain amount of naivete on the part of Franklin D. Roosevelt in trusting the intentions of Joseph Stalin for Eastern Europe after the war. This miscalculation could infer that actions should have been made to prevent the Iron Curtain from descending on Eastern Europe after the war ended. The third and sixth documents are written by the Soviet leadership. They blame the United States and Britain for starting the war because of their goals of capitalist world domination. The documents suggest that if weaker countries do not follow the lead of the Americans they will pay the price. Even the sixth document, which was written by an American statesman is critical of the expansion of the American military. In reading all of the documents, they seem to point to the United States as the instigator of the Cold War.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment