Skip to main content

How and why did the Civil Rights movement change from one that was primarily non-violent to one that was more activist?

There was a shift in the Civil Rights Movement in the 1960s. While the movement had generally been one focused on nonviolent protests, there was more activism in the 1960s.


Some African-Americans believed that change would come quicker if more confrontational activities occurred. They believed that non-violent protests weren’t bringing about change quickly enough. They believed that attitudes really hadn’t shifted a great deal, especially in the South.


Groups like the Black Panthers and the Nation of Islam advocated stronger actions to try to deal with the issues that were affecting the African-American community. In some instances, this involved confrontational actions. They believed this would bring about change faster than relying on purely non-violent methods. Bobby Seale and Huey Percy Newton founded the Black Panthers. While they weren’t afraid to use violence, they wanted to make life better for the African-American people. They developed a ten-point plan to bring about equality in housing, education, employment, and civil rights.


Martin Luther King, Jr. was concerned about the direction the Civil Rights Movement could take. He addressed these concerns in a famous letter that he wrote while he was in jail in Birmingham in 1963. In his letter, he talked about how his actions in Birmingham were viewed as extreme. He took issue with that statement. He said his movement stood in the middle between two opposing groups in the Civil Rights Movement. He talked about one group that was ready to give up because they had been beaten down so often. He mentioned the other group consisted of people that were angry and bitter. He hinted that these groups would be more willing to support violence and specifically mentioned the Nation of Islam. He indicated his group is more moderate and shouldn’t be viewed as an extremist group.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

etymology - Origin of the greeting "Sweet dreams".

Does anybody know the etymology of the phrase "sweet dreams"? I tried googling but did not find anything satisfying. Is this a relatively new phrase of the modern world or has this been in use for some time? I think it's the latter one. Answer The OED has the interjection as "a farewell to someone going to bed" from the 20th century: 1908 Sears Roebuck Catal. 198/1 Tenor Solos..Good Bye, Sweet Dreams, Good Bye. But it goes back until at least the 19th and possibly 18th centuries. John Wolcot, writing under the pseudonym of Peter Pindar, used it in his poem "Orson and Ellen; A Legendary Tale" published in 1801: Also from 1801 in The infernal Quixote (Page 287) by Charles Lucas: In the March 1776 of The Universal Magazine was published "The Serenade. A Pastoral Tale. From the German of Gesner" , where the shepherd Daphnis watches over his beloved as she sleeps and sings: The same tale appears in 1776's as Idyl XI, " Daphnis ...

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

What are the similarities between the relationships of the characters in The Outsiders and Romeo and Juliet?

At first glance, it might appear as if the characters in  The Outsiders  by S. E. Hinton and  Romeo and Juliet  by William Shakespeare do not have much in common; however, when one isolates the core of the conflicts, it becomes clear that the relationships in both stories are rooted in rivalry and secrecy.  In both  The Outsiders  and  Romeo and Juliet , an overarching theme is rivalry. While   socioeconomic status separates the greasers from the Socs in The Outsiders , last names separates the Montagues from the Capulets, who appear to be relatively equal in terms of socioeconomic status. Due to these rivalries, there are instances of deadly interactions in both stories. In  The Outsiders , Johnny kills Bob (whether his actions were justified or not is debatable). In  Romeo and Juliet , Romeo kills Tybalt and Paris, and Tybalt kills Mercutio. These deaths have profound effects on the main characters. In Ponyboy's case, the Johnny's death and other events in the novel inspire h...