Skip to main content

What evidence from Act 1, Scene 2 of Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice tells us that Portia is intelligent and witty?

Act 1, scene 2 of Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice is when Portia and Nerissa discuss the different suitors who have come to court to play the game of chance for Portia's hand. Portia has not been impressed with anyone so far. Nerissa names them off in this scene, and Portia gives witty and informative reasons as to why she doesn't like each one. She is witty because she can joke about each suitor's character and personality to make Nerissa laugh, but she also shows her intelligence because she can peg each one exactly.


In fact, Portia is so good at categorizing each man that by today's standards, she might be considered prejudiced because she pokes fun at their stereotypical vices. For example, when Portia criticizes the man from England, she makes fun of the fact that he doesn't know any other language than his own. The English would conquer a nation and force everyone to speak English, so Portia plays on that with her comments. Of the Frenchman, she says that he is so drunk all of the time that he would "fence with his own shadow" (I.ii.52). Basically, she is saying that the French are always drunk. Then, when discussing the Scottish man, she jokingly says that he offered to punch the Englishman based on their history of violence with each other. Portia describes the German as follows:



"Very vilely in the morning when he is sober, and most vilely in the afternoon when he is drunk. When he is best he is a little worse than a man, and when he is worst he is little better than a beast" (I.ii.72-75).



Thus, Portia proves herself to be eloquent, as she is intelligent, and funny, as she is witty. She mocks manhood by nationality and pegs the stereotypes of her day in the process. This scene helps to support the feasibility of her disguise as a doctor of law later, in the court scene with Shylock, where she proves her intelligence and wit on a more serious level.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.