Skip to main content

In Seedfolks by Paul Fleischman, why does Curtis plant tomatoes in the lot?

Curtis plants tomatoes in the lot in order to impress Lateesha, the girl he wants to marry. Accordingly, Lateesha had stopped seeing Curtis five years ago when she discovered other girls in his life. For his part, Curtis admits that he has now sobered up and is serious about marrying Lateesha.


The only problem is that she won't give him the light of day. So, knowing how much Lateesha enjoys eating tomatoes, Curtis plants six Beefsteak tomato seedlings in the garden lot right across from her third-floor apartment. He weeds, fertilizes, and picks the bugs off the tomato plants diligently. In due time, the tomatoes grow abundantly. Curtis also stops going about shirtless; his goal is to show Lateesha that he is a man of refinement, despite the fact that he has muscles. To Curtis, growing tomatoes is the only way he thinks he can show Lateesha that he's serious about being a good candidate for a husband.


In due time, Curtis puts up a sign in front of the tomatoes that says "Lateesha's Tomatoes." All of his work is rewarded when he catches sight of Lateesha looking down at the sign he has just made.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.