Skip to main content

In To Kill a Mockingbird, what is Judge Taylor's attitude toward his job?

Judge Taylor in Lee's To Kill A Mockingbird takes his job seriously. He is the only judge in a racist community when a very controversial case crosses his desk. Rather than play to the white majority's wishes to convict Tom Robinson without much of trial, Judge Taylor appoints the best lawyer in the county to defend a black man. He knows Atticus Finch will provide the best possible defense for Tom Robinson even though the community might hate him for it. He does this because he believes everyone deserves a fair trial. The book doesn't come out and say these things explicitly, though. Most of this can be inferred by what Atticus says to his brother about his appointment as follows:



"Before I'm through, I intend to jar the jury a bit—I think we'll have a reasonable chance on appeal, though. I really can't tell at this state, Jack. You know, I'd hoped to get through life without a case of this kind, but John Taylor pointed at me and said, 'You're It'" (88).



Atticus's enthusiasm for justice is exactly why Judge Taylor tells him "You're It." He knows Tom Robinson has a chance with such a good lawyer. By providing Tom with a good lawyer, Judge Taylor shows he is not a part of the racist majority of Maycomb.


On the other hand, Scout points out that Judge Taylor runs his courtroom "with an alarming informality" (165). She says Judge Taylor often looks sleepy, puts his feet up on the desk, and has been seen cleaning his fingernails with a pocketknife! Although he may seem disconnected or disinterested while sitting on the bench, Scout says the following about Judge Taylor's attitude:



He was a man learned in the law, and although he seemed to take his job casually, in reality he kept a firm grip on any proceedings that came before him (165).



Therefore, Judge Taylor's attitude towards his job may seem relaxed on the surface, but ultimately, he has more control over what is going on in his courtroom than it appears.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.