Skip to main content

In A Christmas Carol, how does Dickens use the Ghost of Christmas Past to make an effective story?

First, Dickens makes the Ghost of Christmas Past part of an effective story by making him a vivid character. For one thing, the Ghost's appearance is quite distinctive and memorable. He wears a white tunic decorated with flowers, holds a sprig of holly, and a jet of light emanates from his head. Further, while he is the size of a child and unwrinkled, he has long white hair. Most curious of all, he fluctuates: sometimes he is whole and sometimes all Scrooge can see is an arm or a leg.


The Ghost also has a distinctive personality. He is authoritative and won't let Scrooge, who is unwilling to travel with him, off the hook. Second, he interacts with Scrooge in ways that encourage Scrooge to question his own assumptions. For example, when the Ghost sees how much Scrooge longs for Christmases past, he mocks him using Scrooge' own speech patterns:



A small matter,” said the Ghost, “to make these silly folks so full of gratitude.



Although that's exactly what Scrooge might have said a few hours before, now he realizes it is not such a small matter to be kind and generous to people. 


The Ghost's interaction with Scrooge helps him to change into a better person, contributing to an effective story. Just like Scrooge, we are not likely to quickly forget this ghost. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.