Skip to main content

Describe the development of early atomic theory, including contributions from Dalton, Thomson, Rutherford, Bohr, and Schrödinger.

Human understanding of atomic theory has developed vastly, thanks to the contributions of several scientists whose work spanned the early 1800s through the 1920s. The work of Dalton, Thomson, Rutherford, Bohr, and Schrödinger occurred over a short period, and their discoveries advanced atomic theory rapidly. Below is a brief summary of each of their contributions to atomic theory.



John Dalton


John Dalton was a scientist in the 1800s. Simply, he was the first to describe atoms and their properties. His contribution to atomic theory consisted of five main tenets (1805): 



  • All matter is composed of small particles called atoms.

  • Atoms are the smallest unit of matter; Matter cannot be broken down into units smaller than atoms; Atoms are indestructible.

  • There are different kinds of atoms; atoms of the same kind of element are identical to each other. Atoms of the same element are identical in mass and size and have the same properties.

  • In chemical reactions, atoms are rearranged, combined, or separated.

  • Compounds are formed when two or more different kinds of atoms join together.



J.J. Thomson


J.J. Thomson was a scientist who lived from the mid 19th century until the mid-20th century. Around the turn of the century, he was the first to discover sub-atomic particles: he is credited with the discovery of the electron. Thomson's discovery led to related discoveries around isotopes and radioactivity.



Ernest Rutherford


Shortly after Thomson's discovery of the electron, Ernest Rutherford discovered a concentration of mass within the center of an atom, which he called the nucleus. His famous Gold Foil Experiment in 1909 showed that atoms were composed of a nucleus surrounded by electrons. His discovery added to atomic theory by describing the atom more accurately as a conglomerate of several subatomic particles.



Niels Bohr


Niels Bohr was an active scientist around the same period as Rutherford. They worked together on a model to describe the structure of the sub-atomic particles of an atom. The Rutherford-Bohr model, or simply the Bohr model (1913), describes the atom's structure as similar to a solar system. The nucleus is in the center and smaller particles such as electrons circularly orbit around it. Bohr's model is seen as a precursor to current quantum theory.



Erwin Schrödinger


Erwin Schrödinger created several equations that advanced the understanding of atomic theory on a quantum level. Early in his career, he described the movement of an electron as a wave-function. In quantum mechanics, Schrödinger's equation (1926) is a physics description that describes quantum behavior in relation to time. Schrödinger's description of atomic structure, the wave mechanical model, describes electron position within orbitals, not orbits. This conceptualization of atomic structure posits that electrons do not orbit in circles as Bohr suggested, but rather in a much more complex manner. Schrödinger's work was at the forefront of a sea change moment in scientific history when atomic understanding was advancing into the quantum realm.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more