Skip to main content

What issue is Patrick Henry talking about that is "nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery?"

Although Patrick Henry delivered his “Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death” speech before the Declaration of Independence had been written and signed, the issue that he addresses in this speech is, essentially, the issue of American independence.  He is saying that the colonists can fight (and risk dying) for freedom or can choose to live in slavery. 


Henry delivered this speech in March of 1775.  The colonies had, of course, not actually declared independence.  The battles at Lexington and Concord had not yet occurred.  The Virginia Convention was not discussing whether to declare independence.  However, this was the issue that Henry was talking about.


The actual subject of debate was whether to organize militias in every county of Virginia to fight, if needed, against the government.  Henry had proposed this, but some delegates thought that it was a step too far or that it was too provocative.  Henry did not agree.  He argued that the colonists had tried everything they could to resolve their issue with the British government.  Now, he argued, they had no choice but to get ready for war.  It is clear from his words that he believed the colonies were fighting for their freedom and independence.  He said



If we wish to be free-- if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending--if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained--we must fight!



In this passage, he is arguing that the colonists have been struggling for freedom for a long time.  He says that they must either continue to fight or they must “basely” (meaning in a cowardly or dishonorable way) give up.  When Henry says this, it is clear that the issue he is addressing is the issue of American independence.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more