Skip to main content

differences - "Prefer to do something" vs. "would prefer to do something"


Are these sentences different?


"I prefer to walk."
"I'd (would) prefer to walk."


In some books I read one is used in general and the other in specific situations.


So when you say "I prefer coffee to tea" you are stating something in general, and when you say "I'd prefer coffee to tea" it is in that specific situation that you would like coffee", and maybe you will want something else in another situation.
Is it correct, or can we use prefer in specific situations, too?



Answer



The "would" implies a conditional and is thus, as already mentioned, more polite. E.g. the host offers you tea but you prefer coffee:



I would prefer coffee, (if that is possible/if you do not mind/if it does not trouble you)



You can of course still say "I prefer coffee" without the conditional, but it just isn't as polite. One could infact understand it as a rejection that comes very close to a "to hell with your tea, I only drink coffe".


As you noticed yourself "I prefer coffee to tea" seems very general. Nevertheless, another possibility to show the difference between both is the general expression:



I would prefer coffe over tea any time



Even thought it is not limited to the situation it has a conditional which implies that you are fine with tea if e.g. no coffee is available.


to your first example applies the same:



Shall we take a cab or walk home?


I would prefer to walk. (If it doesn't bother you, if you ask me, if my opinion counts)



These conditions are normally not phrased since it appears to be even politer not to mention them. Just one condition would reduce the effect, but naming multiple at the same time would be weird/overly polite.


Example:



"I would prefer coffee, if you got any (implies one does not care about the nuisance one might be for the other)"


"I would prefer coffee, if it isn't any trouble to you and if you have any. otherwise i am really fine with tea i am so sorry that I at all brought up my preferences."



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more