Skip to main content

meaning - Does a comparative always need to compare with something?


As I understand it, comparatives compare with something. So something that is colder is more cold than another thing. However, can't a word like colder be used as an adjective without being compared to something else? For example, is it ungrammatical to say the following?



People who live in colder climates should be careful about their heating bills.



The adjective cold could be inserted in place of colder, but I think the meaning would be different. To me colder sounds like 'somewhat cold' as opposed to 'absolute cold.'
So my questions are as follows:
1. Is this use of colder grammatical?
2. If so, is it still considered a comparative?
3. Do you agree with my understanding of colder vs. cold in the example?



Answer



Sure, the name comparative does not proscribe the valency. It is just the form that is used when you are comparing two things.


In cases when you have one thing it can still be used.


Following cases are typical:
- we want to compare to some average
- the thing we are comparing to is already established from the context
- we want to be deliberately vague


In this case it is called null comparative.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more