Skip to main content

grammar - What does this "it" refer to?



Furthermore, Gilbert’s vibrant description of Naples’s pizza makes it sound unique and delicious.



Does the "it" in the sentence above refer to the description or the pizza? Would it be better to rewrite the sentence as the one below?



Furthermore, Gilbert’s vibrant description of Naples’s pizza makes the pizza sound unique and delicious.



If I remember correctly, pronouns refer to previous noun mentioned. However, the word "pizza" is in a prepositional phrase. Therefore, doesn't the "it" refer to the word "description"?


(My goal is to say that the pizza sounds unique and delicious. This is pretty self-evident, but I just want to be as clear as possible.)



Answer



First, forget the supposed rule that pronouns refer to the most recent noun mentioned. It's not really how they work. As a reader, you should try to figure out the antecedent by looking at what would make the most sense. As a writer, you should only worry if there is a possibility of confusion, which there isn't in this case. If there is a possibility of confusion, you should make the situation unambiguously clear by more means than just the word order.


On the other hand, it is perfectly possible for the antecedent noun phrase to be in a prepositional phrase or a genitive phrase.


Moving on to grammatical issues, it's actually impossible for the antecedent to be "Gilbert’s vibrant description" in this case because that is the subject of the sentence, and "it" is the object. When the subject and the object are the same, we generally need to use a reflexive form, something like this:



Furthermore, Gilbert’s vibrant description of Naples’s pizza makes itself sound unique and delicious.



Since a reflexive form is not used in the original sentence, we know that the subject and object refer to different things.


"It" can't refer to "Gilbert" because he is a person. The remaining possible antecedents for "it" in the sentence are "Naples" and "pizza." Since cities are usually not described as "delicious," we know that "it" must refer to "pizza."


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more