Skip to main content

Is it correct to use question words in declarative senteces?



Some examples of what I mean:



  • "What the eggs are for, is to prepare the cake."

  • "What my husband is, is a nice guy."

  • "What a bird is, is a kind of animal."

  • "Where the station is, is close to the Centre"


I am not sure if this is something I am just misusing from the Spanish.



Answer



These are examples of a kind of sentence called a Wh-Cleft (aka Pseudocleft) construction.
They are constructed from a simpler sentence and mean the same thing. E.g,




  • I want him to trim the hedge. =Wh-Cleft=> What I want him to do is (to) trim the hedge.




  • He told me (that) it was raining. =Wh-Cleft=> What he told me was (that) it was raining.




  • Bill's wearing the/a white sweater. =Wh-Cleft=> What Bill's wearing is the/a white sweater.




Wh-Clefts are very complicated and have many arbitrary restrictions. For instance, cleft sentences insert a form of be as a fulcrum between the two cloven pieces, and therefore they are reversible around that fulcrum of cleavage:


The/A white sweater is what Bill's wearing.


They are part of a family of Cleft constructions, like the It-Cleft:



  • Bill's wearing the/a white sweater. =It-Cleft=> It's the/a white sweater (that) Bill's wearing.

  • Bill's wearing the/a white sweater. =It-Cleft=> It's Bill (that's/who's) wearing the/a white sweater.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.