Skip to main content

word choice - Is it correct to say "the bird is in the tree" or "on the tree"?


In the children's rhyme:



Johnny and July sitting in a tree
K I S S I N G
First comes love
Then comes marriage
Then come children in a baby carriage



They are said to be sitting in a tree. Likewise, when a bird is sitting on a branch, we say it's sitting in a tree.


Is it ever correct to say a bird is on a tree?



Answer



Your case is special. If you were to say two people were "sitting on a tree" in this case, it would imply that the tree was on the ground—i.e., that it had fallen or been cut down. Sitting "in" a tree means sitting in among the branches, most likely at least partly hidden from view.


Further discussion


I wrote the above eight years ago, and still stand by what I say. Nevertheless, there are nuances to everything. Consider first this stanza from W. B. Yeats's "Sailing to Byzantium":



That is no country for old men. The young
In one another's arms, birds in the trees,
—Those dying generations—at their song,
The salmon-falls, the mackerel-crowded seas,
Fish, flesh, or fowl, commend all summer long
Whatever is begotten, born, and dies.
Caught in that sensual music all neglect
Monuments of unageing intellect.



The poet is concerned here to draw a contrast between old and young, and the birds (in the fragment I boldfaced) are on the youth side of that equation. No place, there, for fallen trees; these are youthful, upright and leaf-covered.


Now, the leaves are probably the origin of the use of the preposition in with respect to trees: the birds are in among the leaves. Unless the foliage is sparse, you probably can't even see the birds, though birdsong may announce their presence. They are in among the branches, in among the foliage. Even on a leafless dead or dormant tree, though, we still refer to birds in the trees.


Note, however, that it is entirely proper to say that a bird lights on (or upon) a branch. There it is quite obvious we are close enough to actually see the bird in the tree.


Now, just to confound everyone (and reveal the nuance), consider another reference. This is from The Mikado by Gilbert & Sullivan, from the song "Tit-Willow":



On a tree by a river a little tom-tit
Sang "Willow, titwillow, titwillow"



This is a legitimate usage, one that would seem to contradict my statement about the in usage. But I don't think it does. Gilbert is offering a little sketch of a bird singing, and to do so it must sit on a branch. We're given a close-up of the bird, and the economy of words necessary to lyricize a simple song forces Gilbert to pare down the verbiage, so the ideas are telescoped: "On a branch of a tree" simply wouldn't scan. And had he used in in this case the focus would have been widened to emphasize the tree, not the bird—hardly appropriate to the song of a little bird.


This whole matter just illustrates once again how squishy and difficult prepositions can be in English—or in any language, for that matter.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more