Skip to main content

Can you help me understand the poem "Heptonstall" by Ted Hughes, including the historical/biographical background that might be connected to it?

Heptonstall is an ancient village in Yorkshire, England, the birthplace of Ted Hughes. Before the Industrial Revolution, it was home to weavers, who had large windows in their dwellings so that the sunlight would brighten the area where they worked. However, as Hughes's poetry demonstrates, humanity cannot truly dominate nature. Furthermore, there is something savage about nature in Hughes's poems. Hughes himself wrote that his poetry exhibited



"The collision of the pathos of the early industrial revolution – that valley was the cradle of it – with the wildness of the place."



Heptonstall is also where the writer Sylvia Plath, wife to Ted Hughes, is buried.


In the first stanza of his poem "Heptonstall," Hughes describes this village where life has long struggled against death. It is black from age and the Industrial Revolution's pollution and dead dreams. A poet who describes his poems "as a sort of animal" (Poetry in the Making, London, 1967, p.15), Hughes uses the skulls of the sheep in the second stanza and the bird to metaphorically describe the tragic history of the old industrial town. 


The final four lines convey humanity's struggles in this ancient area. Hughes expresses the relentless cruelty of experience as both life and death try, but "Only the rain never tries." Humanity cannot dominate nature.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.