Skip to main content

In the story "Once Upon a Time," why does Nadine Gordimer choose the words "happily ever after" and "once upon a time?"

At the beginning of the story, Nadine Gordimer gives the frame story. She tells the reader that she has been asked to write a children's story for an anthology. Initially, she does not accept the offer, replying that she does not write children's stories. She doesn't like the idea that she "ought" to write something. However, her creaking house and worries about crime in the area prevent her from going back to sleep. So, she begins to tell herself a bedtime story. This is to be the so-called children's story that she mentioned earlier. This is her children's story within the frame story. 


Sticking with the traditional fairy tale form, she uses phrases like "once upon a time" and "happily ever after." She describes a family in a crime-ridden town, similar to her own. In order for them to "live happily ever after," they continue to improve the security of their home. Eventually, a once simplistic home becomes more like a prison designed to keep criminals out. In the end, the little boy, inspired by a fairy tale from a book his grandmother (referred to as a "wise old witch") had given him, tries to get through the security coil. He is killed and the story ends. Gordimer uses those phrases ("happily ever after" and "once upon a time") because she'd been challenged to write a children's story. The phrase "happily ever after" turns out to be quite ironic (situational irony) because the story ends in tragedy. 


Gordimer's story alludes to the transition in South Africa from the apartheid to an unknown future. The family in the story claims not to be racist but they do worry about people "of another color." Gordimer uses the frame story and the story within the story to allude to South African culture (1989 at the time it was published) and how it is not a fairy tale situation. Therefore, the "happily ever after" phrases are meant to be ironic.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.