Skip to main content

If evolution is real, then why are there still apes and monkeys on Earth?

There are some common misconceptions regarding evolution that I think may have prompted your question. The first misconception is that humans evolved "from" apes or monkeys. The truth is that humans are a kind of ape, although a relatively hairless variety, and we are essentially evolutionary "cousins" to other apes rather than the evolutionary "grandchildren." All existing species of apes descended from a common ancestor, and before that there was a common ancestor which gave way to monkeys and apes. 


The second misconception I believe to be at work here is the common opinion that humans are the ideal form. Some people feel that humans are the best species to ever have existed, and that some day, all existing species will give way to human-like forms. I will explain more in just a moment about how this is not even possible, but for now I would like to mention that it is teleological. Teleology assumes that all changes are in a certain direction, with a predictable or desired end result. In this case, Homo sapiens or being human-like is the desired, valuable end result. In reality, being human-like is only valuable to us--humans! A fish has no desire or need to be human-like beyond basic characteristics that all animals share. Fish don't have a need to walk on two legs or communicate socially. If they did, they wouldn't be fish.


Evolution is the result of two major forces--one is mutation (lots and lots of random changes in genes) and the other is environment. When a certain gene or set of genes helps an organism to thrive in their environment, it is more likely to be passed on. Environments are constantly changing, though, so organisms have to change to keep up! Evolution describes this long-term process of changes which help an organism to survive in their specific environment. So, returning to your original question about why monkeys and apes still exist, it's because these species are well adapted for their environments, and we humans are well adapted for ours. 


The Smithsonian has a great website all about human evolution and where we came from! There's even a "family tree" depicting the many evolutionary changes that have occurred throughout our history. If you look at some of the photos of faces and bodies of the many species we can consider "cousins," you may see that as you go further back in time, the more species in our lineage resemble chimpanzees. That's because humans and chimpanzees are descended from a common ancestor. If chimps are our "cousins," then this (as yet unidentified) common ancestor is "grandma"!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more