Skip to main content

What is the relationship between Charlotte Bronte's Jane Eyre and her next novel, Shirley?

There are a few similarities between Charlotte Bronte's Shirley and her novel Jane Eyre. For one thing, there is no doubt that Shirley is a continuation of the discourse on women by Brontë that began with her previous novel.


  • Victorian novels

Both novels are classified as Victorian narratives that critique certain aspects of Victorian society and the historical setting. The two novels both fall under the category of the popular “public” novel, as there are characters of various social classes and the narrative informs the reader about the society of the time.
Certainly, industrialization is a part of the focus of Shirley but not a concern in Jane Eyre. Nevertheless, the narrative of Brontë's next novel also involves its plot with class consciousness and the role of women in society, as does Jane Eyre. Not unlike Jane, Caroline, who is also an orphan, secretly loves a man who is in a higher socio-economic class than she is. Caroline also has an identity crisis, but after she falls ill from being heart-sick and weak, her long-lost mother appears. As she is reunited with her natural mother, Caroline is given a reason to live and recovers. Similarly, Jane Eyre finds her relatives, St. John Rivers and his sisters, and is reunited with Mr. Rochester.


  • The "Woman Question"

Perhaps the strongest relationship between the two books is that of the "Woman Question"; that is, women's roles and their legal status. This "question" involves women's roles in society and how they are regarded. Not unlike Jane Eyre, Shirley Keeldar is an independent and strong-willed woman, although she is able to achieve more because of her social position as an heiress. Nevertheless, Jane Eyre, like Shirley, is able to choose whom she loves and marries. Thus, both women find self-fulfillment in marriage.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.