Skip to main content

`r=asintheta` Find the points of horizontal and vertical tangency (if any) to the polar curve.

To find a tangent line to a polar curve,`r=f(theta)` we regard `theta` as parameter and write it's parametric equations as,


`x=rcos(theta)=f(theta)cos(theta)`


`y=rsin(theta)=f(theta)sin(theta)`


We are given the polar curve `r=asin(theta)`


Now let's convert polar equation into parametric equation,


`x=asin(theta)cos(theta)`


`y=asin(theta)sin(theta)=asin^2(theta)`


Slope of the line tangent to the parametric curve is given by the derivative `dy/dx`


`dy/dx=((dy)/(d theta))/((dx)/(d theta))`


Let's take the derivative of x and y with respect to `theta`


`dx/(d theta)=a[sin(theta)d/(d theta)cos(theta)+cos(theta)d/(d theta)sin(theta)]`


`dx/(d theta)=a[sin(theta)(-sin(theta))+cos(theta)cos(theta)]`


`dx/(d theta)=a[-sin^2(theta)+cos^2(theta)]`


`dx/(d theta)=a(cos^2(theta)-sin^2(theta))`


use the trigonometric identity:`cos(2theta)=cos^2(theta)-sin^2(theta)`


`dx/(d theta)=acos(2theta)`


`dy/(d theta)=a(2sin(theta)d/(d theta)sin(theta))`


`dy/(d theta)=a(2sin(theta)cos(theta))`


Use the trigonometric identity:`sin(2theta)=2sin(theta)cos(theta)`


`dy/(d theta)=asin(2theta)`


We locate horizontal tangents by finding the points where `dy/(d theta)=0` ( provided that `dx/(d theta)!=0` )


and vertical tangents at the points where `dx/(d theta)=0` ( provided that `dy/(d theta)!=0` )


Setting the derivative of x equal to zero for locating vertical tangents,


`dx/(d theta)=0`


`acos(2theta)=0`


`=>cos(2theta)=0`


`2theta=pi/2,(3pi)/2,(5pi)/2,(7pi)/2`


`=>theta=pi/4,(3pi)/4,(5pi)/4,(7pi)/4`


Let's find the corresponding radius r for the above angles,


For `theta=pi/4`


`r=asin(pi/4)=a/sqrt(2)` 


For `theta=(3pi)/4`


`r=asin((3pi)/4)=a/sqrt(2)`


For `theta=(5pi)/4`


`r=asin((5pi)/4)=-a/sqrt(2)`


For `theta=(7pi)/4`


`r=asin((7pi)/4)=-a/sqrt(2)`


Now let's set the derivative of y equal to zero for locating horizontal tangents,


`dy/(d theta)=0`


`asin(2theta)=0`


`=>sin(2theta)=0`


`=>2theta=0,pi,2pi,3pi`


`=>theta=0,pi/2,pi,(3pi)/2`


Now, find the corresponding radius r for above angles,


For `theta=0`


`r=asin(0)=0`


For `theta=pi/2`


`r=asin(pi/2)=a`


For `theta=pi`


`r=asin(pi)=0`


For `theta=3pi/2`


`r=asin((3pi)/2)=-a`


Note: If we plot the polar curve , its a circle and it should have two horizontal and two vertical tangents. However we got four points because it depends on a, whether it's positive or negative.


For positive value of a ,


the polar curve has horizontal tangents at `(0,0),(a,pi/2)`


and vertical tangents at `(a/sqrt(2),pi/4),(a/sqrt(2),(3pi)/4)`


For negative value of a,


the polar curve has horizontal tangents at `(0,pi),(-a,(3pi)/2)`


and vertical tangents at `(-a/sqrt(2),(5pi)/4),(-a/sqrt(2),(7pi)/4)`

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.